• Publisher: North American Tiddlywinks Association
  • Publication name: The Missing Wink
  • Whole number: 3 (marked as Volume II, Number 1)
  • Publication date: February 1975
  • Page side count: 14
  • Editors: Scott Hirsh, Sunshine, Mary Kirman
  • Preparation: Manual typewriter with headlines formed from various sized letters, cut and pasted onto sheets
  • Print production: photocopied in black and white on 8½” by 11″ white paper.
  • Archives: original photocopy (NATwA) 
  • Bill Renke (also appearing humorously as Winke, Mr. Vegetable, and Catnip Renke)
  • Severin Drix (also appearing as Sevvy)
  • Goff Jenkins
  • Myro Mykolyshyn
  • Greg Linden (also appearing as his nickname, Bozo)
  • Dave Lockwood (also appearing humorously as Lokweed)
  • Steve Robbins
  • Bill Gammerdinger (also appearing as Gammer and as his winks nickname, Red Scarf)
  • Scott Hirsh (also appearing in the nom de plume, R. U. Keating)
  • Mary Kirman
  • Sunshine (also appearing as *; real name: David Sheinson)
  • Carl Chenkin (also appearing as his nickname, Spike)
  • Jake Solomon
  • Dave Pinckney
  • Dave Barbano, from the Cornell team
  • Wee Willie (?, humorous usage)
  • Diane Bachman
  • Tim Schiller
  • Tina Warren
  • Don Fox
  • Rich Davis
  • Steve Krasner
  • Ross Callon (also appearing humorously as Moose)
  • David Solomon (appearing as his nickname, Beast)
  • Sid Freund
  • Paul Zive
  • Rose (?)
  • Joe Random (?, a fictitious name)
  • Albert Wu
  • Mike Loehr
  • Marty Fischer
  • Buck Webb
  • Barb Novak
  • Tracy Schneeman
  • Dean Solomon
  • Larry Kahn
  • Jim Marlin
  • Saul Agranoff (appearing as his nickname, TDI: The Dumb Indian)
  • Michael Schwartz (appearing as his nickname, Moishe)
  • Phil Villar
  • Sue Shrut
  • Richard Hussong (appearing as his nickname, L)
  • Joe Sachs
  • Pete Copper
  • Craig Schweinhart
  • Ferd Wulkan (real name: Peter Wulkan)
  • Steve Markson (appearing as his nickname, Evets)
  • Dick Henninge
  • Michael Krasner
  • Andy (probably Tomaszewski)
  • Roger Clarke (also appearing as his nickname, RG)
  • Charles McLeod
  • Rosie Wain
  • Ronald Rumm
  • Richard Nowogrodzki (appearing as his nickname, Fitz)
  • Mike Gottesman
  • Mitch Wand
  • Rick Tucker
  • Nancy Brady
  • Robert R. Reid, a Montreal-based game manufacturer
  • Rich Steidle
  • Alan Dean
  • Dr. Kleinfelder
  • Ag: Agriculture
  • ARW: Association of Retired Winkers
  • ARWA: ARW, Auxiliary
  • ARWAs: ARW, Associates
  • ARWE: ARW, Emeritus
  • ARWR: ARW, Regulars
  • C&C: Crown and Centipede, a team
  • CHYM: call letters of an Ontario radio station
  • CORN: Cornell
  • Hen Hud: Hendrick Hudson High School
  • HOTT: Halloween Open Teams Tournament
  • Hyth: short for Hark Yon Trees Hath No Leaves But They Will Out Club (HYTHNLBTWOC), a team
  • Jugg: Juggernauts
  • MES: (?), a school in New York City
  • MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • MITwA: MIT Tiddlywinks Association
  • NATwA: North American Tiddlywinks Association
  • RIV: Rivendell
  • TKO’s: The Knowledgeable Ones, a team
  • TMW: The Missing Wink
  • TOR: Toronto
  • W-L-T: wins, losses, ties

SPECIAL COMING-OUT ISSUE

The MISSING WINK

[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]

Volume II · February 1975 · Number 1

[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]

CANADA COPS CROWN

Cowplops Influence Felt

Winke Rolls

SPECIAL PRE-RELEASE FROM 1977 NEWSWINK

(appears on pages 1 and 4)

Like a seed planted for a future harvest, a parcel was buried by a bleary-eyed but far-sighted Winx Canada team outside Ithaca, N.Y., at the time of the 1974 Western Regionals. Easily refindable by its proximity to a field of 26 cows, this stash of strategy would prove to be one of the keys to the wild outcome of the 1975 Continentals…

The atmosphere was electric on that fateful Saturday in February, the first day of the Continentals. Heading Division I was a hard-on MIT team, a team that gave new meaning to the “Cambridge blues”. Stung by the petering out of their proposed January marathon and the discovery that 40 Boston winkers couldn’t get it up as long as six Boy Scouts, MITWA cruised into town lusting for their first big score. Rivendell remained in seclusion, away from the devil’s temptations, while Serurnan dipped into his bag of drix for a pinch of Gotter-dammerung. But woe to the Zoo, who, perhaps too confident of Saturday’s victory, played a challenge round with Toronto on Friday night and found their downfall in cow dung. Mr. Vegetable, up all night in a toking duel with Goff and Myro, vanished in a puff of smoke. The Zoo hunted through the fields, looking for a replacement, and literally stumbled upon a certain Bozo, recently returned from Morocco. Befuddled and befogged, they hung close to MIT, but Rivendell’s new double blitz, double boondock, double whammy tactic reduced them to helpless turds of laughter, and they gurgled all the way down the drain.

Meanwhile, in Division II, the traditional schedule-tampering had provided openings for two Toronto pairs to participate along with the usual three from Somerville, Cornell, and the TKO’s. Somerville almost didn’t make it to the match, having gotten into an accident on the way to Ithaca. The opposing car was totaled, and its driver, one Steve Robbins, was obliged to look karma in the eye and join the team. Cornell, as usual, was prepared to play the host and accept defeat gracefully. They got a little resistance on that score, however, from the TKO’s, who, in accordance with their new constitution (see “Hyth TKO’d at Westerns” in this issue) were out to play for fun. Since they were more serious about having a perquackey tournament on Sunday, they decided to avoid getting into the finals at any cost by reversing Mr. Lokweed’s first “object of the game”, namely “to win”. As * said later, they were “as hot as ice”; poor Gammer strangled in his scarf as his team subbed and piled themselves into blissful surrender, and * potted out his opponents, while boondocking himself off the mat. * led his squad with a 0.6 p.p.g., eclipsing a mark set by a McGill pair in the 1971 Pairs Tournament. Finally, Toronto, fielding whoever could stand, blitzed their opponents and themselves in an effort to prolong a strategy marathon begun 12 hours earlier. When they learned they had bungled their way into the finals, they fell asleep in dismay. The snow began to fall.

Ithaca’s imaginary sun, however, had not yet set before further events took place, which are indirectly responsible for the late appearance of Newswink. (We are enjoined by the NATwA Supreme Court from publishing the details of the embroglio so as not to reveal the facts before they are concocted. The recipe, we expect, will come forth in the 1980 issue.) The practical result of it all was that Dave Barbano, checking his cows up at the Ag School, found Wee Willie there, asleep in the hay, and Catnip Renke, complete with squidgers, was sold to the Rivendell team for 3¢ a pound. Interviewed the following morning, the engineer of the deal said, “He’s worth his weight in renks.” Said engineer also mentioned that she’d thrown in her own services as part of the deal for free and added, “I just want to play with a winner.”

Thus the stage was set for the finals on Sunday with an anxious MIT team on the pole position with 33, Rivendell 30, Somerville 24, and Toronto 18. A tense situation developed right at the beginning when it was decided by a 2-1 vote that Toronto would be allowed three pairs, despite having used only two to make the finals, and their comeback was under way.

Severin began soon to discover that Catnip and his squidgers were a Pandora’s box of trouble. Catnip demanded Dealin’ Diane as his partner, but Drix did also. In the end they decided to arbitrate the question; the only person they could agree would be equally unfair to each of them was Tim Schiller, and Tim decreed they should play with each other and leave Diane to Dave Pinckney.

Toronto came out smoking. And Severin discovered that Bill and Diane, with their fickle catnip ways, had pledged never to squop with any other partner. Severin struggled valiantly, even once potting out against what was effectively three opponents, but Rivendell could salvage only 23 points from the round. And the Somervillains brought MIT back to earth, plodding relentlessly to a 38-25 decision.

Going into the last round then, Somerville was looking good with 62 points, trailed by Toronto and MIT at 58 and Rivendell, sulking at 53. The wizard threw up his wands in disgust and resigned the captainship, leaving Tina in command. With Bill and Sev separated now, Rivendell began to close the gap, as Somerville felt the bite of vengeance from both ends. MIT and Toronto battled neck and neck, but in the end Toronto’s depth earned them a one-point win, and their whoops and hollers echoed through the hall. In the only game outstanding, Diane had just potted out in rounds against Somerville’s Don and Rich; Renke was ready for the kill when he felt a hand on his shoulder and saw his old nemesis before him. “Here,” said Goff, “pot now—play later.” Just one toke was all it took, and the DT’s were calling out for Mr. Vegetable. The game score was 5-2; the final Toronto 90, Rivendell 89, MIT 89, Somerville 89. Thus did the now legendary Bill Renke knock off the three top contenders and return the CHYM trophy to Canada; the Zoo by not playing, Somerville by playing against them, and Rivendell by playing for them.


Notes from the Collective

(appears on page 2)

Once upon a time, somewhere in North America, there lived a set of winks. This was no ordinary set of winks but a magic set of winks. In this magic set, each wink represented something important to the game of Tiddlywinks, The two big winks stood for physical skill (squopping, potting, etc.) and mental skill (strategy). The four small winks stood for general attitude, solidarity (see TMW #1), the executive position (Secy.-Gen. in NATwA), and last but not least, communication (sometimes known as the “news wink”).

As any winker knows, playing without one wink is a disadvantage. For two years, NATwA has been without any form of newspaper and hence was a bit weak. The challenge was clear: put out a newspaper and save NATwA. Three courageous winkers—Scott, Mary, and Sunshine—decided to meet the challenge and supply NATwA with the missing wink. The rest is now history,

Today, our fate rests in your hands. Some would like to see Toronto take over Newswink and restore it to its lofty position as the official NATwA publication. Others wish to see The Missing Wink replace Newswink and thereby receive NATwA subsidy. Since our staff cannot agree on any one position, we won’t take a stand. The issue belongs before the Congress and hopefully something will be resolved. And please let your feelings be known; don’t let any blabbermouths dominate the discussions.

Hoping you enjoy this issue,

R. U. Keating

[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Severin Drix
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Sunshine
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Mary Kirman
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Bill Renke
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Bob Henninge
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Ferd Wulkan
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
Scott Hirsh

HYTH TKO'D AT WESTERNS

(appears on page 3)

Ithaca, N.Y.— In a closed door team meeting on the eve of the Western Regionals, HYTHNLBTWOC, North American Champions, faced with decaying fun, a retiring dictator, and a mounting threat of mutiny, decided to end it all. Though the revolution [sic original=”cought” correct=”caught”] some by [sic original=”surprize” correct=”surprise”]— Moishe, “i never thought i’d see the day”, and B. Red Scarf G.,” “, (said with open mouth)—we are easily able to trace the seeds of revolt.

In April 1971, Carl “Spike” Chenkin, one of the original Juggernauts (and founders of the ARW), considered defecting from HYTH and organizing a new squad. Believing that recruiting would be easier after a championship season, Carl decided to wait until HYTH, at the time only a contender, would wear the NATwA crown. That dream was realized in February 1974 when HYTH finally emerged victorious (see TMW #1) after several large misses. Then, in the fall of 1974 the benevolent dictator’s right hand retired. This was followed by a slackening of interest by his left brain and left hand. Jake, another Jugg, proposed mutiny and *, also displeased with the attitude and lack of activity of *, helped to organize a New Regime. When the team hit Ithaca for the Regionals everything was ready. After long discussion, with a [sic original=quarum” correct=”quorum”] present, the motion to disband was passed by a 4 to 2 to 1 margin, [sic original=”abstensions” correct=”abstentions”] coming in second. Some of the passed motions were as follows:

  1. That HYTH be disbanded
  2. That a new squad be formed
  3. That * hold the office of TKO of the squad
  4. That the squad be called TKO’S
  5. That fun, not winning, be the squad goal
  6. That TKO’S were The Champions, not the defending champions
  7. That the squad follow the squad slogan: We play sensible

In the most unpredictable and hotly contested Western Regionals in NATwA history a new squad, calling thenselves TKO’s eventually landed in first place. The winkend was full of many [sic original=”surprize” correct=”surprise”]. First, all four Western teams actually showed up, not to mention some [sic original=”renegrades” correct=”renegades”] from the East (a Western tradition). This set up such twists of fate as: Toronto unveiling rookies, Rivendell and Cornell playing well, HYTH disbanding, Dave Pinckney stretching his winning streak to 19 games before a 4-3 loss, and finally, Rivendell being thrown to the Eastern wolves when TKO’s Juggernautted their way to victory. Meanwhile in the B division, Dave Lockweed put his super star card on the table in a challenge match against the Red Scarf himself to become the 8th member of NATwA’s 100 victory club.

       TKO'S  RIV CORN TOR TOTAL   W-L-T
TKO'S    —    39½  33½  32  105   16-10-1
RIV     23½    —   38   41  102½  15-12
CORN    29½   23    —   42   96½  13-13-1
TOR     31    22   21    —   74    9-18

Retirement: The 1st Step

(appears on page 5)

In the opinion of many observers, the most important business at the annual gathering of the NATwA clans was the creation of the ARW—the Association of Retired Winkers. A list of proposals was brought forth by Steve Krasner and Carl Chenkin, both of whom had retired from winking several times. Except for one proposal, all the ARW suggestions passed fairly easily. Item #6, however, ended in a 14-14 tie with 10 abstentions. Secretary General Renke broke the tie in favor of the ARW, pending definition of “a retired winker” to NATwA satisfaction.

These were the proposals:

  1. Lifetime subscription to Newswink
  2. Old Timers match at each Continentals, Cambridge blue sets
  3. An article in each Newswink on retired winkers
  4. Roster of retired winkers
  5. Booth at each Continentals for recruiting purposes, table to be supplied by NATwA
  6. One week of “Meals on Wheels” prior to the Continentals based on a rate of 1½¢ per mile for distance travelled from bed to front door
  7. Free plastic replica of squidger to be available at Continentals to visitors on Squidger Day engraved with NATwA (plastic by NATwA, engraving by ARW)

However, no discussion of the definition of “a retired winker” followed and communication between the ARW and the NATwA power structure has been non-existent. Fortunately, the Missing Wink was able to interview an ARW member who was willing to give his informal ideas on just what was a retired winker:

ARWR ARW, Regulars

winkers playing less than 50% as many tournament games as in the average of their 2 most active years (or less than 6 games) with the reduction being one of choice

ARWA ARW, Auxiliary

winkers not playing any tournament games but who did in the past; inactivity due to circumstances beyond their control (i.e. marriage, etc.)

ARWAs ARW, Associates

winkers able to attend only occasional matches due to circumstances (i.e. boondock-ment, with money for travel)

ARWE ARW, Emeritus

winkers still active in tournaments, but who are contributing less than 50% of the effort as in their 2 most active years; judgment on contribution level to be by vote of the ARW

ARWRd ARW, Running Dogs

winkers who play but not in tournaments; fellow travelers


(appears on page 5)
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]

Confessions of a Pumpkin

(appears on pages 6 and 7)

My story begins four years ago.

I was then just a naive teenager out of a small New England town. My hair was short, glasses horn-rimmed, and my strongest high came from Manischewitz wine. Those were the days. Then things began changing rapidly: I was turned on to herb and rock music, then got involved with the “subculture” and all the things associated with it. The turning point was my association with an odd lot of MIT winkers.

When I first met these people I sensed something peculiar but nothing I could put my finger on. In retrospect it is all so very clear—the way their hands shook, their pinpoint pupils, the strange expressions they used like “far out” and “right on”. But they were a lot of fun, hackers to the first degree, and they did get high a lot (the mark of a together group). Anyhoo, seeing that I was getting into their “trip” and vice versa, the MIT animal farm decided to draw me into a world from which few ever manage to escape—Tiddlywinks. “Hey, wanna play some Tiddlywinks?” they asked enthusiastically. “Er… tiddlywinks? I thought only weirdos play tiddlywinks.” The peer group pressure was too much for me to handle; I gave in.

Yes, I can now say it. I have a pumpkin on my back. It started out innocently enough. Games on the weekends accompanied by some weed and music. Very casual, unlike the fevered pitch of bridge which they sometimes played. So, after playing a while, you get pretty good. “Why don’t you play in the regionals, it’ll be a lot of fun and you’ll meet some nice people.” Why not? It was decided I would play in the regionals for MIT “B”.

THE FIRST TASTE

I never will forget my first taste of pumpkin bread: honey colored, generously replete with raisins, just the right amount of sweetness and, oh yes, firm but neither springy nor heavy. Bliss!

“What’s with this pumpkin bread?” I innocently asked. “Oh, we always have pumpkin bread at tournaments, it’s the official food of NATwA, was the answer I received from a wide-eyed lass whose all-too-active bosom was causing some winkers to miss their shots. Hmm. “Well it is good.” I played two games that day and was beaten so badly that I didn’t realize how much pumpkin bread I had eaten. I was on my way.

After the regionals, one of the MIT animals, Moose, and myself started playing together. Moose caught on real fast and by the time the Continentals rolled around (no pun intended) we were ready. We played in the “B” league for MIT “C” and did quite well, losing only one game out of twelve. The pumpkin bread was of course everywhere, beckoning forth from the Canadian bread bags which protected its flavor, and surrounded by other winkers who could not help themselves from indulging in “just one more piece.” “I say, isn’t it remarkable how everyone goes for that pumpkin bread” I remarked. “Yes, everyone must eat pumpkin bread” was the reply. I was beginning to get the picture and I knew I was in over my head. I had to get to my community leaders for help. My clergyman (oops, I mean clergyperson) said “the road to hell is paved with pumpkin bread.” My doctor told me “stay away from pumpkin bread; it’ll lead to harder stuff. Why, statistics show that 90% of all Grateful Dead addicts started with pumpkin bread.” Well, you can’t argue with science. The chief of police gave it to me straight: “Possession of pumpkin bread in this state is punishable by not less than two and not more than ten years imprisonment or a fine of up to $10,000 or both, and besides, uh, beer is better for you.” Holee shit, better stay away from that mother-fucker. My guidance counselor proved to be the last straw. “Play with pumpkin bread and you’re playing for keeps. It’s a dead end street. Go to business school and make something of yourself.” Fuck that. I’d rather be with winkers than these “respectable” types. No, I won’t kick the pumpkin bread habit!

The next year the animals won the North American Championships, with my partner and I tying for top pair. I gradually became friends with more of the winking community and oh that pumpkin bread. I’ve already taken the next step and tried recruiting some people. I also help write a newspaper. What was true four years ago is still true today—never underestimate the power of a pumpkin.


JUGGERNAUTS

(appears on page 7)

It being, I have no doubt, a matter of great familiarity to all and sundry, precisely what the historical meaning of Juggernaut is, I will involve myself no further in an explanation of it than to say that it is in Hindu mythology the name of the eighth avatar of Vishnu (i.e. Krishna) and more to our particular point, designated the uncouth idol of Puri, India, which upon being dragged once a year through the streets, invites thousands of adoring devotees to abjure their wretched lives by throwing themselves underneath its wheel, crushing themselves in the process.

Now, the awareness of the TKO’s being Juggernauts, which state was inherited from the now defunct Hyth, came slowly to us, and was, in fact, the result of a painstaking recreation of certain recently heard key remarks, elements of which have an entirely mundane devotation in English, but which in Hindi are seen to have chillingly exalted referents.

It was a blustry and tenebrous evening that found me ensconced in my bedchamber, working on an anagram for obverse, when my mind in wondering over the meaning of some recent [sic original=”occurences” correct=”occurrences”], was bemused by the incongruity of certain aspects of them. Giving over for the time, my aforementioned puzzle, I considered the accident which I and a few squadmates had been involved in. I was noting that the gentleman who had been responsible for the rather rude interruption of our trip was a Hindi, and was further quietly pondering the fact that * was in the car. Thinking that *, being a very common [sic original=”atribute” correct=”attribute”] of the Godhead, I chortled to myself that had our newly made acquaintance been aware of *’s presence, he no doubt would have remained discreetly away.

Then, in what at first I thought merely to be an aimless meandering of my mind, but soon was proven to be a fortuitous jump, I began to consider what I thought had been said to me while I was unobtrusively kind of lying in the middle of the highway. I thought I heard an ambulance attendant say “Here’s another piece”, or, perhaps “You got another piece?” With a shock, the entire mystery became pellucid. The above was not remarked to me; it was not made by an ambulance attendant, and it was not in English.

Most of you are no doubt anticipating the denouement, but I shall express it anyway.

The remark was addressed to * and it was “Jagat natha … peace” which means “Lord of the Universe … peace”. Jagat natha is also the derivation of Juggernaut.

This established, it was child’s play to put the remaining pieces together. Our impetuous acquaintance, desiring to show homage to *, threw himself under the wheels of our vehicle, forgetting only to extricate himself from his own car first.

And this is the true and hitherto unpublished story of the origin of the Juggernauts.


NOTES FROM THE UNDERAGE

(appears on page 8)

With the exception of Rivendell, NATwA teams have been made up predominantly of college students and college rejects. Only Severin’s teams have been largely composed of junior and high school age. However unknown to much of NATwA, there has also been a fairly active Junior NATwA for the last 4 years.

In 1970 two former Cornell players, Severin Drix (Blue Mountain) and Sid Freund (MES in NYC) were teaching and also brave enough to start winks clubs at their respective schools. In January 1971 a Hyth squad journeyed to Blue Mountain for an unofficial match with Severin’s team. Matches between the two schools followed.

By the following year Sid was coaching a team at Rye Neck that was able to storm from behind to win the first Junior Continentals over two teams from Blue Mountain and Beast’s team from Philadelphia. In June an allstar team from the two schools battled against the MIT World Championship team.

Many of the Blue Mountain squad, besides playing for Rivendell in NATwA matches such as the Western Regionals, HOTT, and Continentals, were also now in high school, and formed a Hendrick Hudson (Hen Hud) team and, in the opinion of one S. Drix, loomed as favorites for the 1973 title. Playing on their home grounds, the Rye Neck Panthers despite trailing by 10 points at the lunch break, once again prevailed, capturing their second straight title. Hen Hud stumbled to third place behind Blue Mountain.

But 1973 was almost the end for Blue Mountain. The coach moved to a more traditional winks area, players moved and/or graduated, and the team weakened. Rye Neck fared even worse. Equipment was ripped off, replaced, and ripped off again, and ended up being Milton Bradley winks and a chemistry lab pot. Then Sid, despite his teaching an innovative math course in tiddlywinks, was fired for ”disrupting faculty morale”.

Thus the 1974 Juniors consisted of no Rye Neck, a watered down 2/3 of a Blue Mountain, a Hen Hud team hungry for victory, and a new Drix creation, the Crown and Centipede from Ithaca High School. Hen Hud was a veteran team–Dave Pinckney (1973 Jr. Singles champ), Jonas Bastys (the true underground winker—parental objections forcing him to resort to sneaking away to play winks), Tina Warren (member of the first Rivendell team in 1971), Paul Zive, and a new player Rose, who played in the match with the legendary Joe Random. Crown and Centipede included Albert Wu (NATwA rookie of the year) and Lyle Hodgson (who were to emerge as the top pair in the match), Mike Loehr, Marty Fischer, Buck Webb, and Barb Novak. Faced with such problems as relative inexperience and a school track tournament that claimed some of their best players, C&C resorted to inspirational T-shirts. Hen Hud countered with the appearance of Tracy Schneeman, a veteran Junior Continentals cheerleader. With one game remaining the score was tied at 62½ with Blue Mountain dead at 16. Rose held off a blitz to win the final game 5-2 and earn the Hen Hud players their long awaited victory.

Junior players will hopefully continue to play in their own matches as well as in NATwA sanctified events. However, we have not yet seen the very large contribution they may soon make to NATwA; perhaps some of these players will in the near future be starting winks teams in colleges where the art of winking is currently unknown.


NATwA Records

(appears on page 9)

Can you match the winkers on the left with the one record they own on the right? All % records refer to players with 95 or more games. For answers see page 13

  1. Dean
  2. Don (som)
  3. Larry (mit)
  4. Albert
  5. Ross
  6. Jim (x mit)
  7. TDI
  8. Moishe
  9. Sev
  10. Phil
  11. Bill (tko’s)
  12. Dave (cor)
  13. Sue (x mit)
  14. L
  15. Mary
  16. Joe
  17. Myro
  18. Pete (x mit)
  19. *
  20. Craig
  21. Ferd
  22. Evets
  23. Dick (case)
  24. Bill (zoo)
  25. Michael
  26. Dave (riv)
  27. Dave (mit)
  28. Andy
  29. Carl
  30. Dave (zoo)
  31. Bob (som)
  32. Steve (not Evets)
  33. RG
  34. Tim

A Most wins 1 day vs. one person
B Most consecutive non Boston games
C Highest % of 0-7 games
D Lowest % of 1½-5½ games
E Longest squidger pot
F Most games till first defeat
G Most games till first 4½-2½ win
H Most games till first 0-7 or 7-0
I Most partners one match
J Most games solo at one continentals
K Longest winning streak in Canada
L Youngest North American champion
M Most games solo in B division continentals
N Most games as partner of D.Lokweed or Lockwood
O Most wins in rookie season
P Largest % of wins being 4-3
Q Most losses to 1 pair in 1 season
R Most often anagramatized name (at matches)
S Lowest % of 5½-l½ and 1½-5½ games
T Most y’s in last name
U Longest winning streak in Ithaca solely
V Longest winning streak, start of season
W Tied, broke, and tied record for losses one season
X Longest winning streak in Boston
Y Largest lifetime standard deviation per game
Z Most 4½-2½ games
* Most curling stones dropped, 75 season
% Most games in 12 game match
& Lowest % of 4-3 or 3-4 game.
@ Highest points per win average
? Best worst match of career
! Best average in first match
” Best second longest winning streak of career
$ Best lifetime average vs. Severin


(appears on page 9)

There’s a movement in the works to bring winks back to the state of Ohio; the Case team disbanded two years ago. This new [sic original=”fronteering” correct=”frontiering”] is a Somerville offshoot including Bob, Rich, and mary. They are planning to set up camp in the wilds of southeastern Ohio this April. The preliminary work putting up a shelter/garage, planting a garden, installing a saw mill, and building a cabin should be out of the way by late fall so that the real [sic original=” fronteer” correct=”frontier”] can be won for the glory of NATwA. The pioneers would appreciate any moral or physical support the east could lend.


HISTORY II

This article was written by Severin Drix. The first part of the article appeared in The Missing Wink 3.

(appears on pages 10 and 11)

(You can stop sitting on your thumbs, folks; here is the Grand Old Memory’s second installment of Winks History…)

The next winks season, 1966-67, was not nearly so productive as the previous one had been. The first match was in February 1967, at MIT, the “triangular” match in which the disastrous showing of a Harvard team that had combined all three previous ones (undergrad, Med school, and Radcliffe) stunned everyone, and turned out to be Harvard’s last winks match. The score was Cornell 150, MIT 135½, Harvard 50½. Cornell then made repeated efforts to set a date for a match with the champions, Waterloo, but nothing came of it. The only other match that season occurred when MIT clobbered Columbia that April. Columbia had just started a team and joined NATwA; after that one match they were never heard from again.

The 1967-68 season was even less eventful: only one match, though it was a big one. It was the first match ever to be called a Continentals, and all NATwA teams were invited. It was held at Waterloo, during the celebration of the anniversary of the founding of that university, so that the University paid for hotel accomodations for visiting winkers, as well as free lunches. Charles McLeod had left North America, and there was by now only one team in Waterloo. Harvard at the last moment said they couldn’t come, and no word came from Columbia. The teams that came were Cornell, MIT, and the newly-formed Toronto team. That match was also the North American debut of Phil Villar, who was playing for Cornell with Rosie, his old team- mate back at U. of London. Up to this time, winks had modeled itself after other campus sports and clubs, and though nothing in NATwA explicitly stated that team members must be students, that had been the practice. Precedent already existed in England for non-students playing with the most convenient team around, but this marked the first time such a thing was done here. This expansion of the definition of a team to a group of people rather than a group of students paved the way for our current informal definition of teams, including teams like Hyth, Zoo, and Rivendell. Waterloo did not like this idea, partly on principle and partly because Phil’s superior play led Cornell to victory over the home team favorites. After the match, Ronald Rumm, the Waterloo captain, answered no letters, did not send the official score sheets as promised, didn’t send the local publicity as promised—and his check for Waterloo’s $2 NATwA dues bounced!

Following the Waterloo tournament was a frighteningly long lull in winks activity. The next winks match was the Continentals at Cornell in December 1968, over a year later. At Waterloo, the consensus had been to switch from the old challenge cup format of tournaments to a yearly Continentals, with round robin play to determine the next champion. Cornell, as the new champ, was to be the site of the next Continentals, and it was up to them to arrange the time for this event, some time in the fall of 1968. Cornell, however, was in a state of disarray. The captainship had shifted from Severin to Fitz, who didn’t really want it, and accordingly did next to nothing. No new players were recruited, many old ones were lost to graduation, or moved away, or dropped out of winks, and meetings were poorly attended. The team had once had 15-20 active and semi-active players, but by December 1968 it had to struggle to find eight players, several of them quite green, to form the team. Meanwhile Mike Gottesman was still theoretically Secretary-General, but nobody heard from him at all, and he had dropped out of winks. Attempts to contact Harvard, Columbia, or Waterloo all failed, and so the realization slowly came that NATwA consisted solely of Cornell, MIT, and Toronto. So these people, seeing that the leaders they had looked to no longer existed, held the Continentals and at that meeting re-formed NATwA. This event marked the real beginning of the third NATwA, when leadership officially passed over to the new winkers, and when many important changes to NATwA’s structure occurred. MIT won the event decisively, becoming the first champion not built around a British superstar; in fact, none of the three teams present had any British players at all. (Rosie had left Cornell for Ottawa, and she and Phil had lost contact with NATwA. Around this time she reported in a letter to Winking World that winks in America was dead—she was not far from the truth.) A new Secretary-General was finally chosen to fill the void: Mitch Wand. Mitch had succeeded Ferd as MIT captain and had continued the steady growth and activity of that team. He had also introduced some new ideas and a remarkable capacity for hard work and efficiency. As Secretary-General he was to be a great success. At this meeting (the second Congress ever held, the first being the meeting where NATwA was formed) it was also decided to fix the date of the Continentals, to insure that they would occur, since the 1968 Continentals had been repeatedly postponed (someone or other not being able to make any of the tentative dates), almost into 1969. That fact bothered us (the Waterloo triumph at NATwA’s founding was considered the 1966 title, and Cornell’s win at Waterloo the 1967 title), so we decided to move the Continentals from the fall to the spring, so that even if scheduling problems forced a postponement, the championship for a year would still be held during that year. We chose Washington’s Birthday weekend since it was the only spring semester date we could think of that gave a travel day without being a long vacation. That meant that the 1969 Continentals was going to be held in just a little over two months from the 1968 Continentals, but this awkwardness was felt to be well worth the chance to get winking back on a firm footing. The site, as in times past, was to be that of the champion, namely MIT this time. In all, it was a very fruitful Congress, and it laid the cornerstone for NATwA as we know it today.


(appears on page 11)
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]

ZOO STORY

How the East Was Won

(appears on page 12)

Boston—Marking their first step on the comeback trail, the Zoo powered its way to the Eastern Championship at MIT the winkend of Dec. 7-8. Led by the electrifying pair of Scott and Craig, the Zoo finished with 137½ points, 25½ ahead of 2nd place Somerville and 45 in front of surprisingly weak MIT. Not only did Zoo finish with 3 of the top 4 pairs, but they only lost 7 games out of the 30 they played . The main reason for the big gap between 1st and 2nd places was the severe drubbing Zoo handed Sevvy’s Babies, beating them 64-20, 13 more points than 2nd place Somerville could manage.

Although the Zoo comes off looking very strong, the level of winking was generally mediocre, and in particular the winking of Dave-Joe and Sevvy-Bill G lacked finesse. MIT did get one reprieve in the pair of Rick and Larry who won 5 of the 6 games they played and proved to be a very fine pair indeed. Bob and Nancy turned in the strong performance for Somerville, and Zoo utility man Barry won his first NATwA game.

On the fashion scene, the “eyes” had it. Yes folks, the Somerville Psychopaths showed up sporting third eyes in the center of their foreheads and wore an assortment of hats while the Zoo boasted batiked team shirts. It was all very chic.

       ZOO SOM  MIT RANDOM  TOTAL   W-L
ZOO      —  36½  37  64      137½  23-7
SOM     26½  —   34½ 51      112   17-13
MIT     26  28½   —  38       92½  13-14
RANDOM  20  33   25   —       78    7-26

the felt forum

(appears on page 12)

On Saturday, November 30, 1974, Mr. Robert R. Reid, a game manufacturer based in Montreal, walked into the World Singles Match at MIT. With him he brought some samples of foam rubber backed mats and the desire to “make tiddlywinks the biggest craze in America”. With games like Tiddly-Baseball, Tiddly-Golf, and Tiddly-Tennis, he hoped that tiddlywinks would have some attraction for everyone. Though still in the design stage, these games would soon go into production and would be ready for marketing early in 1975, according to Mr. Reid .

So far, two months later, no progress has been made. The S.H. Kunin Felt Co. of Worcester, Mass., manufacturer of the mats, is ready to begin production, awaiting only final decisions on the design of the games. All proposed designs, as of November 30, according to winkers who talked with Mr. Reid, suffered from two basic faults when compared to our four-color game: namely, lack of potting and lack of squopping. These ideas may now be being implemented by Mr. Reid. But it would seem imperative that representatives of NATwA contact him in order to advise him on the design of his games so that they can be marketed as soon as possible. There are other problems to be overcome, such as low mat springiness, high slickness, abundant wrinkles, and the use of American-style die cut winks, but these can be dealt with when the design is finalized.

On the home front, the equipment situation is looking better. More sets and mats are available than in recent months, and another shipment of mats is expected soon from England.


Off the CUP

(appears on page 13)
Kudos to Joe and Rich of MIT (yawn) for setting the new two-man marathon record for tiddlywinks (yawn) with 324 hours (zzzz…) They played 55 four color games….

The duration of the marathon was actually 32 hours and 12 minutes. The marathon was held in the lobby of MIT’s Building 10 in January 1975.

There will always be an ETwA: Alan Dean, one time supreemo on the English winks scene, lost his singles title this year. How about an English chapter of the ARW….

The Missing Wink recently learned that they have been chosen to publish “The Great White Wink”. According to sources, it will be printed in the next issue….

Yearbook news: TMW is making an effort to put out a tiddlywinks yearbook. Needed are pictures, team stories, or whatever. Send all material to The Missing Wink, Apt. #3, 15 Montfern Ave., Brighton, Mass. 02135….

MIT winker Joe was courageous enough to try one of the fruit (pineapple-cherry) pizzas in Toronto. Said Joe, “It was good but it could have had more fruit”….

A tip of the hat to the Toronto people for their hospitality last month. Needless to say, the strategy was intense, especially on Saturday night…

Call any vegetable: One time triple crown winner and oft times vegetable Bill Renke lost the world singles title at MIT to a Ringer from Ithaca….

The answers to the records quiz can be found quite simply by just putting the people’s last names in alphabetical order; each person’s place in this list corresponds to to the position of their record….

The Missing Wink now has two lifetime subscribers—Bill Gammerdinger and Dave Lokweed. These are two guys who know a good deal when they see one….


LETTER

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

(appears on page 13)

What is the purpose of winks and why do we play? Self-examination should be and is a continuing process undertaken by all winkers and must also occur in NATwA. Do we play for self-gratification, the camaraderie involved, the travel to various tournaments, enjoyment of the intense competition, or what? The answer, of course, is yes to all of these. So the question resolves itself to how much of each. For each winker, priorities are different, and so the real problem is the purpose of NATwA itself. Was it formed to (a) advance the sport of winks, (b) provide a focus for getting together with friends, (c) maintain the status quo in North American winks, (d) simply provide a means of expression for our views on the international winking scene, or (e) provide a governing body for competition in North America?

My personal feelings are that (a) and (e) are the most important, with (b) being a nice extra. Without the present tournament schedule winking friends from various winks centers would get together much less frequently. But if we expect and want winks to expand, what are we going to do about it? Are we going to depend on MIT and Severin and to a lesser extent Toronto and Cornell for all the new blood (and no new teams) or are we willing to undertake the difficult task of expansion into areas hitherto ignorant of winks. It’s not easy to snare prospective winkers, but this is necessary for winks to achieve the world acclaim it so rightfully deserves.

It’s nice to [sic original=”phantasize” correct=”fantasize”] about tournaments with two or three hundred winkers; enough people in each winks center to hold friendlies 2 or 3 times a month; or even, perhaps, “pro” winks, but we’re nowhere close to it yet.

If you like winks, and I do, you can probably find others who would also enjoy it. So why don’t you?

Dave Lokweed


TIDDLYWINKS DOUBLE CROSTIC PUZZLE

(appears on page 14)
[+template:(Tucker Tw ID • [+xmp:title+] — publisher • [+iptc:source+] — title • [+xmp:headline])+]
(a) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Oppressed, like a perennial
     1  44  29  66  22  113 116 11  77  109 56  loser, like a doormat
(b) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Veterans moan about the lack of it; 
    84  50  74  23  104 88  42  33  14  that vintage atmosphere (2 words)
(c) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ The kind of shooting that wins; also, a certain
     7  91  49  112 107 62  emperor's predicament (2 words)
(d) ___ ___ ___ ___ An unaccountable streak of bad luck against a particular
     4  55  21  67  opponent; a hex
(e) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ A wink in its
    87  27  100 92  10  48  43  106 81  18  114 34  72  79  16  flight (2 wds)
(f) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Insect commune (2 words)
    95  102 12  64  76  71  108
(g) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Toronto's undoing (2 words)
    38  111 24   2  46                                          To be done in
(h) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ one continuous
    45  47   3  26  96  15  117 36  61  63  105 107 78  19  69  stroke (3 wds)
(i) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Nervousness
     6  83  28  98  73  32  53                              Many players do it
(j) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ after a game, some
    68  51  25  101  97 60   8  35  75  31  85  20  94  90  before (2 words)
(k) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Winkdom's nearly
    59  30  93  82  80  54  39  110 17  86   5  13  70  eternal triangle (2 wds)
(l) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Dr. Kleinfelder's famous retort (2 words)
    37   9  40  58  115 65  89
(m) ___ ___ ___ ___ To forcefully submerge
    52  41  99  57
Using the clues at right, fill in the words, then transfer the letters up into the puzzle. Work back and forth from the puzzle to the blanks until both are filled in. The puzzle will reveal a winks situation; the first letters of each word, (a) through (m), will yield a further commentary. Thanks, Craig.

To be provided! The information provided below may not be entirely accurate.

Word starting at 75: TACTIC; at 81: IS; 83: ???; 86: MOVE; 90: THEN; 94: BRISTOL; 101: THE; 104: GREENS; 110: ONTO; 114: REDS

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d) JINX

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k) SUNSCHBOBMARY

(l)

(m)